Posted by Bruce Duensing
ENERGY AS COHERENT INFORMATION
Dedicated To Itzhak Bentov
"If we were to ask the brain how it would like to be treated, whether shaken at a random, irregular rate, or in a rhythmic, harmonious fashion, we can be sure that the brain, or for that matter the whole body, would prefer the latter. The implications of this holographic model are monumental. It implies that all the knowledge in the Universal Mind is available to anyone who can tune into it, because, as in all holograms, the information is totally distributed throughout the universe. Mystical aphorisms such as 'We are all one,' 'As above, so below,' 'God is within you,' and 'The universe in a grain of sand' take on a new meaning when seen in the light of the holographic model..."
-Itzhak Bentov
"The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead."
-Albert Einstein
Information as a coherent form of energy is arranged in the genetics of an alphabetic equation and throughout our lives, we are continually producing it from the lower energy sources we consume in the form of minerals, cellular life, crystals,vertebrate, air, water,chemical compounds and invertebrate matter.
Perhaps an interactive exercise we can undertake as an experimentation is to sit down with a watch which has a second hand, and then proceed to intentionally will your internal babbling dialog of continual associations to cease and desist..for how long can you do this? Does consciousness precede thought?
In other words, can you have self awareness without language as it may be possible that self awareness may be axiomatic if is defined by relationships which arise from an observer although they may have no expression. If this is so we should then reasonable consider that consciousness is more universal as a principle, than we currently recognize.
A Smart Dog, Make No Bones About It
The Washington Post June 12, 2004
"Clever border collie Rico can work out which toy is wanted, even though he has never heard the word before. Owners who claim their dogs understand what is being said and are trying to respond may be barking up the right tree, writes Rob Stein in Washington. Rico, a border collie with what appears to be an uncanny talent for human language, may be the Albert Einstein of dogs or just your average pooch. Either way, he has scientists wondering if man's best friend is smarter than they thought.
A series of studies concluded that the energetic German house dog has an extensive vocabulary and apparently can even do something scientists thought only humans could do - figure out by elimination that a sound he has never heard before must be the name of a toy he has never seen before.
That feat, described in yesterday's Science journal, suggests that dog owners who claim their pets understand what their masters are saying and are trying to respond may have been right all along.
"Maybe this is the Albert Einstein of dogs, or maybe this is something that other dogs can do, too," says Julia Fischer, a biologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who helped test Rico. While many species can be trained to recognize objects' names, what makes Rico unique is that he recognizes so many words, can puzzle out the names of new objects on the first try and weeks later is surprisingly good at remembering what he learned, the researchers say.
The findings are the latest evidence that animals are capable of more complex communication than had been thought, and that dogs, in particular, are especially astute at comprehending their human companions. The findings are prompting some scientists to speculate that dogs might even be able to speak - like Mister Ed, the talking horse in the 1960s television show - if only they had the necessary anatomy.
"If Rico had a human vocal tract, one would presume that he should be able to say the names of the items as well, or at least try to do so," says Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, who studies animal communication and intelligence at Georgia State University."
What were your referential terms prior to language? Of course we say language is a description and not the object we are describing but does thought, this strange form of self organizing energy that we produce, is this the equivalent of a genetic code, or more specifically, is the biochemical energy of DNA a transitional carrier of this energy rather than it's source as to encode means to perform an operation that transform some information from one representational form to another. Something that is performing the act of encoding is, for example, an encrypter, or a compressor.? Is this axiomatic representation of biochemical energy placing the egg before the chicken, when it is neither one which has precedence rather both are an expression of a larger process? Does the genetic expression in biochemistry an existential mechanism that has no interrelationship to other forms of energy?
As the Holographic Principle is analogous to the hologram, in which the form of an object,in this case, information... is fully enfolded in every point on a two dimensional surface. If we imagine a sphere, we see three dimensions, and consequently the surface of the sphere has two dimensions. The third dimension is the radius of the sphere, which can be correlated inward from any given point on the surface of the sphere, to the central point in the sphere. The sphere has a two dimensional outer boundary The third dimension, according to the Holographic Principle, is represented holographically on the surface of the sphere The inside of this organic sphere, the volume or bulk of the sphere, can be imagined as having an energetic field, which corresponds to the matter and vibrations of energy within this sentient sphere and at this boundary is perhaps our temporal and cartographic position in a quantum relationship. So is the genetic expression a biological analogy of an energetic and holographic one that it is nested within?
My son and I were recently watching a reputable science program which presented a scenario of how early humans spoke, the inference in this demonstration was that someone was there to observe this which of course, is nonsense. It is an apt example of theory being overrun by critical assumptions that are based upon non observable data. This interestingly enough is selectively applied toward one's bias, in this matter as science often forgets it is entangled in this state of subjectivity as well as the rest of us. If there was a objectivity applied to experience we would be simply process as computer programs which already know are not sentient.
Perhaps "accident", an interval, an opening is a designed feature while mutational as a probability, it seems rather necessary doesn't it? Perhaps a car collision, a airliner disaster or an earthquake are a designed parameter that also provides the potentiality for an evolutionary adaptation in the interrelationships within a field to seek greater coherence rather than simply a contest of the fittest. I recently had an exchange of views with someone regarding the question, can thought be empirically quantified as in quanta as in quantum organics...and more specifically, is information itself a form of energy in a nested hierarchy or is energy.... information itself and then consequently do we decode it by rearranging it's already coherent potentiality? In other words,when we encrypt energy into a form by the billions, does this form then simply vanish or is it transferable as a form of an unrecognized genetic coherence back to the center of our holographic sphere? Is there a larger sentience that is composite that we are but constituent distinctions within and without it?
If so is there a form of Ashkaic text, a print out if you will of energy as differentiated by the production of thought individuated by observers as it being a referential carrier wave, if you will, of consciousness? In other words a product that is neither embodied or disembodied as it is both two sides of the same coin? This would certainly make for a more coherent model for "ghosting" of coherent behavior as well as perhaps another facet of genetics previously unrecognized. Shortly before his death in his last public appearance, Krishnamurti in very tangible terms, discussed the center of our position as a shared reality that is larger than the sum of it's components. for anyone interested in conceptual models of a holographic reality in quantum terms, this last talk should be an important adjunct to scientific investigations in the sense this, the human experience, is an apt model as well.. which conforms to these principles.
Click below to watch a video on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WmOneLWNDE
In Part Two, we will examine these possibilities in ghosts.
http://materialintangible.blogspot.com/ ... html#links
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
